The notion of progress is just a provocative one, a linear story we've informed ourselves for generations, a tale of ascent from the dark caves of superstition to the gleaming spires of reason, from the raw battle for emergency to the curated ease of contemporary living, a trip noted by the regular deposition of knowledge, the taming of organic makes, and the ever-expanding group of human concern and rights, a journey that, despite their unexpected stumbles and detours, certainly factors upward toward a better, more affluent, and more enlightened future for each of humanity, but what if this history, for many their soothing quality, is fundamentally problematic, a great dream woven from the threads of particular storage and technological triumphalism that obscures a more complicated,
more uncertain, and possibly even more uncomfortable truth, a reality where our greatest advances are inextricably connected to new types of peril, our options provide beginning to novel problems, and our liberation from historical burdens imposes its own, subtler types of confinement, forcing us to encounter the 오피스타 distressing chance that progress is not a direct line but a spiral, or possibly even a severe dance, where every advance can be, in a few important and often unanticipated way, an action sideways or even backward in to a couple of issues we lacked the creativity to anticipate? Think about the enormous step of the Agricultural Innovation, that foundational change which allowed our hunter-gatherer ancestors to be in, to build villages that could become cities and then cities, to keep surplus food which enabled specialization, providing increase to the artist, the scribe, the priest,
and the king, thereby putting the foundation for many future society, artwork, research, and tradition as we all know it, an unequivocal step forward in the individual saga, and yet that really change, as thinkers from Rousseau to contemporary anthropologists have stated, also planted the vegetables of social stratification, of entrenched inequality where for the very first time some men can acquire wealth and energy over the others, it generated the concept of personal home and with it, area disputes and wars of a scale unimaginable to nomadic companies, it reduced populations in to unclean settlements that became breeding grounds for crisis disorders like smallpox and measles, disorders that leaped from the domesticated animals we now lived in close vicinity to, and it often led to a less varied and nutritious diet, resulting in health issues like dental corrosion and
iron-deficiency anemia that have been less common among foraging peoples, therefore we should ask, was this development a natural good, or was it a devil's deal, a business wherever we received the possibility of culture and complexity at the expense of introducing endemic inequality, common conflict, and story kinds of enduring? Exactly the same paradoxical structure repeats with dizzying reliability all through history, take the Industrial Innovation, that good motor of change which started in the wet coal-fields of Britain and spread across the planet, unleashing prodigious productive power, producing unprecedented wealth, stuffing the planet with marvels of design and ease, from railways that shrank continents to electric light that banished the night time, from mass-produced things that increased the typical of living for millions to med